[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F627C4A.3090903@numascale.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 00:33:30 +0100
From: Steffen Persvold <sp@...ascale.com>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale-asia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Use x2apic_supported() in the default_apic_id_valid()
function.
On 3/16/2012 00:04, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 23:34 +0100, Steffen Persvold wrote:
>> Is my understanding of your suggestion correct that in
>> x2apic_phys/cluster.c we add the following apic_id_valid() function :
>>
>> static int x2apic_apic_id_valid(int apicid)
>> {
>> return x2apic_mode || (apicid< 255);
>> }
>
> Steffen, We can have something like:
>
> static int x2apic_apic_id_valid(int apicid)
> {
> return 1;
> }
>
> and
>
> static int xapic_apic_id_valid(int apicid)
> {
> return apicid< 255;
> }
>
> If we have selected x2apic driver, then we know we are already in x2apic
> mode. And also x2apic_uv_x need to use the x2apic version above.
>
If you specify "nox2apic" option, will it choose the xapic driver
instead (and early enough) ? Otherwise I think we might break Yinghai's
commit (a35fd28256e7736cc84af8931a16224f0bfaaf6c).
Cheers,
--
Steffen Persvold, Chief Architect NumaChip
Numascale AS - www.numascale.com
Tel: +47 92 49 25 54 Skype: spersvold
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists