[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F6300BB.9060503@ce.jp.nec.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:58:35 +0900
From: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
CC: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
jbottomley@...allels.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com>,
Axel Theilmann <theilmann@...-sense.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Yet another hot unplug NULL pointer dereference (was Re: status
of oops in sd_revalidate_disk?)
Hi,
On 03/14/12 03:10, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Now that I've had some more time to think about this: has anyone
> considered to hold a reference on the SCSI host instead of the SCSI
> device as long as sd_probe_async() is active ? If sd_prep_fn() can ever
> see a NULL queuedata pointer then that means that
> scsi_host_dev_release() can get invoked while sd_prep_fn() is running.
Holding a host reference does not help, I think.
It does not stop __scsi_remove_device() setting NULL
to sdev's q->queuedata.
So, while there might be another race between sd_probe_async
and scsi_host_remove, I believe your "[PATCH] Fix device
removal NULL pointer dereference" still makes sense.
> That doesn't look correct to me.
--
Jun'ichi Nomura, NEC Corporation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists