linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] HID: autoload hid-multitouch as needed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1203161225110.18356@pobox.suse.cz>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:26:31 +0100 (CET)
From:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To:	"benjamin.tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>
Cc:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Stephane Chatty <chatty@...c.fr>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] HID: autoload hid-multitouch as needed

On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, benjamin.tissoires wrote:

> From: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...c.fr>
> 
> The code is inspired from the one present in the bttv module.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...c.fr>
> ---
> 
> As I mentioned in the mail 0/5, I'd really like to have your opinion on this
> one. I copied the code from bttv, but it forces us to change hid_device which
> is not very good for ABI changes reasons.

It's indeed probably the best and most "lightweight" solution before we 
come up with more robust attitude (with userspace involvement).

Could you please resend the patch with proper changelog entry, and perhaps 
add some more commentary into the code to better explain the reasons for 
this gymnastics?

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/