linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86: export 'pcibios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120316004142.GA3897@udknight>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:41:42 +0800
From:	Wang YanQing <udknight@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Michal Januszewski <spock@...too.org>,
	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>,
	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: export 'pcibios_enabled'

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 05:43:25PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 03/13/2012 01:30 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> > 
> > Export 'pcibios_enabled' so that when uvesafb is built as a
> > loadable module (on X86_32), the build will succeed.
> > 
> > ERROR: "pcibios_enabled" [drivers/video/uvesafb.ko] undefined!
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
> > Cc:	Michal Januszewski <spock@...too.org>
> > Cc:	Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@....de>
> > Cc:	linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org
> > Cc:	x86@...nel.org
> > ---
> > Applies to mainline; found in linux-next.
> > 
> >  arch/x86/pci/pcbios.c |    1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > --- linux-next-20120313.orig/arch/x86/pci/pcbios.c
> > +++ linux-next-20120313/arch/x86/pci/pcbios.c
> > @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> >  #define PCIBIOS_HW_TYPE2_SPEC		0x20
> >  
> >  int pcibios_enabled;
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(pcibios_enabled);
> >  
> >  /* According to the BIOS specification at:
> >   * http://members.datafast.net.au/dft0802/specs/bios21.pdf, we could
> 
> I would think this should be EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL()... this seems like a
> symbol with a very high likelihood to be abused in strange ways.
> 
> 	-hpa
> 
Yes, I think EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL is better. Indeed, there is another issue I 
meet about the pcibios NX protection code.
If I set "pcibios_enable = 1" forcely no matter whether set_bios_x had been executed, then
the BIOS code is not NX. The problem is,  if set_bios_x had not been executed, of course set_memory_x 
for the bios code page has no chance to execute, then why the BIOS code is not NX? Any comment?
Or because the default set for the BIOS range is X, if so we should set_memory_nx if pcibios_enable == 0.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/