lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:51:46 -0300
From:	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
To:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
Cc:	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kay.sievers@...y.org, rdunlap@...otime.net, mchehab@...radead.org,
	perex@...ex.cz, hjlipp@....de, davem@...emloft.net,
	w.sang@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove references to /etc/modprobe.conf

Hi Takahashi,

On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> At Fri, 16 Mar 2012 11:41:16 -0300,
> Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>>
>> Usage of /etc/modprobe.conf file was deprecated by module-init-tools and
>> is no longer parsed by new kmod tool. References to this file are
>> replaced in Documentation, comments and Kconfig according to the
>> context.
>>
>> There are also some references to the old /etc/modules.conf from 2.4
>> kernels that are being removed.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>
>
> It's nice to correct the document, but the change like
>
> -  /etc/modprobe.conf to ensure that the aoe module is loaded when
> +  /etc/modprobe.d/aoe.conf to ensure that the aoe module is loaded when
>
> might be misleading since it looks as if the fixed config file name
> must be used.

What text do you prefer here? I used a mix of them throughout the
patch. Generally when text said it was giving an example I used a
fixed filename. Otherwise I used "/etc/modprobe.d/*.conf" or "a
configuration file in /etc/modprobe.d/"


> Also, the config file name should be with a number prefix.  At least,
> it's recommended so in the recent distros to determine the loading
> order.  However, which number to be used depends on pretty much on the
> distribution.
>
> So, from both points, it'd be better to mention that it's an example
> file name.

Could you rephrase my change so I include it in a v2 patch?

Lucas De Marchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ