[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331932375.18960.237.camel@twins>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 22:12:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 10/26] mm, mpol: Make mempolicy home-node aware
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 13:34 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Mar 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > Add another layer of fallback policy to make the home node concept
> > useful from a memory allocation PoV.
> >
> > This changes the mpol order to:
> >
> > - vma->vm_ops->get_policy [if applicable]
> > - vma->vm_policy [if applicable]
> > - task->mempolicy
> > - tsk_home_node() preferred [NEW]
> > - default_policy
> >
> > Note that the tsk_home_node() policy has Migrate-on-Fault enabled to
> > facilitate efficient on-demand memory migration.
>
> The numa hierachy is already complex. Could we avoid adding another layer
> by adding a MPOL_HOME_NODE and make that the default?
Not sure that's really a win, the behaviour would be the same we just
have to implement another policy, which is likely more code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists