[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120316233814.308629950@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 16:38:51 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Vivek Gani <vgani@...ersil.com>,
Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
Subject: [ 41/41] hwmon: (zl6100) Enable interval between chip accesses for all chips
3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
commit fecfb64422d91a9621a3f96ab75c3a5f13e80b58 upstream.
Intersil reports that all chips supported by the zl6100 driver require
an interval between chip accesses, even ZL2004 and ZL6105 which were thought
to be safe.
Reported-by: Vivek Gani <vgani@...ersil.com>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
Documentation/hwmon/zl6100 | 14 ++++++--------
drivers/hwmon/pmbus/zl6100.c | 11 +++--------
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
--- a/Documentation/hwmon/zl6100
+++ b/Documentation/hwmon/zl6100
@@ -73,14 +73,12 @@ Module parameters
delay
-----
-Some Intersil/Zilker Labs DC-DC controllers require a minimum interval between
-I2C bus accesses. According to Intersil, the minimum interval is 2 ms, though
-1 ms appears to be sufficient and has not caused any problems in testing.
-The problem is known to affect ZL6100, ZL2105, and ZL2008. It is known not to
-affect ZL2004 and ZL6105. The driver automatically sets the interval to 1 ms
-except for ZL2004 and ZL6105. To enable manual override, the driver provides a
-writeable module parameter, 'delay', which can be used to set the interval to
-a value between 0 and 65,535 microseconds.
+Intersil/Zilker Labs DC-DC controllers require a minimum interval between I2C
+bus accesses. According to Intersil, the minimum interval is 2 ms, though 1 ms
+appears to be sufficient and has not caused any problems in testing. The problem
+is known to affect all currently supported chips. For manual override, the
+driver provides a writeable module parameter, 'delay', which can be used to set
+the interval to a value between 0 and 65,535 microseconds.
Sysfs entries
--- a/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/zl6100.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/pmbus/zl6100.c
@@ -178,16 +178,11 @@ static int zl6100_probe(struct i2c_clien
data->id = mid->driver_data;
/*
- * ZL2008, ZL2105, and ZL6100 are known to require a wait time
- * between I2C accesses. ZL2004 and ZL6105 are known to be safe.
- *
- * Only clear the wait time for chips known to be safe. The wait time
- * can be cleared later for additional chips if tests show that it
- * is not needed (in other words, better be safe than sorry).
+ * According to information from the chip vendor, all currently
+ * supported chips are known to require a wait time between I2C
+ * accesses.
*/
data->delay = delay;
- if (data->id == zl2004 || data->id == zl6105)
- data->delay = 0;
/*
* Since there was a direct I2C device access above, wait before
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists