[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120316053829.GG3163@mwanda>
Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:38:29 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] Drivers: hv: Support the newly introduced KVP
messages in the driver
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:36:16PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
>
> Dan,
>
> Sorry I could not get back to you earlier. You are right, in that I am trusting
> the host! I am of the firm belief that in a virtualized environment, if you don't trust
> the host, there is not a whole lot you can do in a guest! I have had this arguments
> with other on this mailing list in the past. Having said that, I think we have spent more
> time debating this than we should; your proposal is reasonable and I will go ahead and
> re-spin those patches based on your comments. I should be posting them shortly.
>
> Regards,
It's not about trusting the host or not trusting the host. It's
about "if you're going to specify a limitter, it can't be off by one
even if you don't expect to hit the limit".
But thanks for redoing these.
regards,
dan carpenter
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists