lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120316054556.GH3163@mwanda>
Date:	Fri, 16 Mar 2012 08:45:56 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	ohering@...e.com, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Drivers: hv: Support the newly introduced KVP
 messages in the driver

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 05:48:43PM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:
>  	/*
>  	 * The windows host expects the key/value pair to be encoded
>  	 * in utf16.
>  	 */
>  	keylen = utf8s_to_utf16s(key_name, strlen(key_name), UTF16_HOST_ENDIAN,
> -				(wchar_t *) kvp_data->data.key,
> +				(wchar_t *) kvp_data->key,
>  				HV_KVP_EXCHANGE_MAX_KEY_SIZE / 2);
> -	kvp_data->data.key_size = 2*(keylen + 1); /* utf16 encoding */
> +	kvp_data->key_size = 2*(keylen + 1); /* utf16 encoding */
> +

I feel like a jerk for asking this, but is the output length correct
here?  It seems like we could go over again.  Also utf8s_to_utf16s()
can return negative error codes, why do we ignore those?

regards,
dan carpenter


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ