[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMbhsRQDdXcKVp-_RNe-0i7YYLr4vKDDXqVw_eP4VsmfbFNtYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 12:21:34 -0700
From: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
To: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@...il.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 3/5] cpuidle: add support for states that affect
multiple cpus
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
<santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
<snip>
> While playing around with this version, I noticed that the
> 'alive_count' is ever incrementing which will lead to
> coupled idle state not being attempted after one CPU offline
> attempt.
>
> Fix in end of the email for the same. With it, coupled states
> continue to work with CPU online/offline transitions.
>
> Feel free to fold it into original patch. Attached
> the same in case mailer eat tabs.
<snip>
Thanks, Kevin reported this issue and I'll fix it in the next version.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists