[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332018034.18960.247.camel@twins>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 22:00:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: cpu_active vs pcrypt & padata
On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 11:44 +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:13:08AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi Steffen,
> >
> > I found cpu_active usage in crypto/pcrypt.c and was wondering what
> > that's doing there. I would really like to contain that thing to as
> > narrow a piece of kernel as I possible can (sched/cpuset/hotplug) but it
> > appears to be spreading.
>
> pcrypt uses cpu_active to tell padata which cpuset it whishes
> to use for parallelization. I could try to push the cpumask
> handling down to padata if you want to limit this to the core
> kernel.
/me more confused now.. cpu_active isn't in any way shape or form
related to cpusets.
> > Also, wth is all this kernel/padata.c stuff? There's next to no useful
> > comment in there and the only consumer seems to be pcrypt, does that
> > really need to be in kernel/ ?
>
> The padata code is generic and not limited to crypto, you can find
> a documentation at Documentation/padata.txt.
Would be nice to have a short blurb in kernel/padata.c with a reference
to that Documentation stuff for more in-depth bits.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists