[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1331969567.3022.233.camel@deadeye>
Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 07:32:47 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Pavel Shilovsky <piastry@...rsoft.ru>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [ 10/41] CIFS: Do not kmalloc under the flocks spinlock
On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 10:14 +0400, Pavel Shilovsky wrote:
> 17 марта 2012 г. 6:37 пользователь Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk> написал:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 04:38:20PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >> 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
[...]
> > But we test this before flock->fl_flags & FL_POSIX, which means we
> > don't know whether this lock actually needs to be assigned one of
> > those structures. So it appears that we might report a spurious error
> > if the lock list ends with a mandatory lock. If so, this is
> > relatively harmless but does need to be fixed.
> >
>
> You are right here, thanks for the catch! I will repost the patch asap.
This has already been merged into Linus's tree, so you need to submit a
patch to apply on top of it.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Life would be so much easier if we could look at the source code.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists