lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120317162853.13afa28b@stein>
Date:	Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:28:53 +0100
From:	Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To:	Wakko Warner <wakko@...mx.eu.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Burning multiple DVDs at one time

On Mar 17 Wakko Warner wrote:
> Stefan Richter wrote:
> > On Mar 15 Wakko Warner wrote:
> > > I'm having problems doing this.
> > > 
> > > When I burn a single disk, wodim shows the drive buf @ 99% consistently. 
> > > The instant that a 2nd disk is being burned, the drive buf on the first one
> > > starts to drop and data stops when the 2nd wodim is performing OPC.
> > > 
> > > During the burn of both discs, the drive buf will drop on both until one of
> > > them finishes.  Both drives see under runs.
> > > 
> > > When one starts fixating, the other will hang until the fixation is
> > > completed.
> > > 
> > > During the burns, the fifo of both never drop below 99%
> > > 
> > > There are no logs that are produced.
> > > 
> > > My burners are:
> > > [6:0:0:0]    cd/dvd  ATAPI    iHAS422   8      4L11  /dev/sr7
> > > [7:0:0:0]    cd/dvd  ATAPI    iHAS224   B      GL05  /dev/sr8
> > > 
> > > Both are SATA drives attached to the onboard sata controller
> > > 00:1f.2 SATA controller: Intel Corporation 631xESB/632xESB SATA AHCI Controller (rev 09)
> > > 00:1f.2 0106: 8086:2681 (rev 09)
[...]
> > This is likely due to serialization by a global mutex in the sr driver.
> > Have a look at thread "[PATCH] [SCSI] sr: fix multi-drive performance,
> > remove BKL replacement" from February. https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/28/230
> 
> Thanks.  I looked at the patch.  I would just like to confirm that I can
> patch my 3.0.0 vanilla kernel, compile the sr module, unload the current and
> load the patched one without the need to reboot.

Yes, this should be possible.

Oh, I only noticed just know that you also wrote:

> > > The kernel is a vanilla kernel v3.0.0.  (This also happened with 2.6.35)

In 2.6.35, the Big Kernel Lock was still in place there.  That lock
behaved differently from a plain mutex --- notably it was released when a
thread went to sleep --- so maybe there is more to your problem than just
sr_mutex blocking unrelated sr accesses.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-===-- --== =---=
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ