[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201203181301.19048.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:01:18 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@...glemail.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware loader: don't cancel _nowait requests when helper is not yet available
On Sunday, March 18, 2012, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 3/16/2012 10:51 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> >> - if (WARN_ON(usermodehelper_is_disabled())) {
> >> + if (is_sleep_task()) {
> >> dev_err(device, "firmware: %s will not be loaded\n", name);
> > Stop these idiotic games already!
> >
> > It's very simple: you cannot load firmware while the system is not
> > readt. Your moronic "let's change the test to something else" is
> > entirely and utterly misguided and totally misses the point.
> >
> > It's not about sleeping, and it's not about anything even *remotely*
> > about that. Stop the idiocy already.
> >
> > How hard is it to understand? How many times do people have to tell you?
> >
> > That warning is very much valid during bootup, and that warning has
> > been *seen* during bootup. For example, try to compile in most
> > wireless drivers as non-modular, and that warning *has* to trigger.
>
> Ok. I like where nowait() is going in the other part of the thread but
> I'm still confused about when request_firmware() is correct to use. It
> seems that the function is inherently racy with freezing. Does every
> user of request_firmware() need to synchronize with freezing?
>
> For example, if one CPU is in the middle of a driver probe that makes a
> request_firmware() call and another CPU is starting to suspend we will
> have a race between usermodehelpers being disabled and the
> request_firmware() call acquiring the usermodehelper rwsem. If the
> suspending CPU wins the race it will disable usermodehelpers and the
> request_firmware() call will return -EBUSY and warn.
Yes, it will.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists