linux-kernel - [PATCH RESEND 2/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Don't pass ATA

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1332100817-25646-2-git-send-email-kys@microsoft.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Mar 2012 13:00:17 -0700
From:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	ohering@...e.com, jbottomley@...allels.com, hch@...radead.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND 2/2] Drivers: scsi: storvsc: Don't pass ATA_16 command to the host

The current Windows hosts don't handle the ATA_16 command and furthermore
return a generic error code after filtering the command on the host side.
For now filter the command on the guest side until the host is modified to
properly handle unsupported commands.

I would like to thank Jeff Garzik <jgpobox@...il.com> and
Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com> for suggesting the correct approach
here.

Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c |   14 +++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
index d5448e8..e9e37dd 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/storvsc_drv.c
@@ -1233,9 +1233,21 @@ static bool storvsc_scsi_cmd_ok(struct scsi_cmnd *scmnd)
 	/*
 	 * smartd sends this command and the host does not handle
 	 * this. So, don't send it.
+	 * The current Windows hosts implement a subset of scsi commands
+	 * and for the commands that are not implemented, the host filters
+	 * them and returns a generic failure SRB status. I have been in
+	 * discussions with the Windows team to return the appropriate SRB
+	 * status code for unsupported scsi commands and while they have
+	 * agreed to implement this, it is not clear when this change will be
+	 * available. Consequently, filtering the command before submitting it
+	 * to the host is a resonable interim solution.
 	 */
 	case SET_WINDOW:
-		scmnd->result = ILLEGAL_REQUEST << 16;
+	case ATA_16:
+		scmnd->result = ((DRIVER_SENSE << 24) |
+                                 SAM_STAT_CHECK_CONDITION);
+		scsi_build_sense_buffer(0, scmnd->sense_buffer,
+					ILLEGAL_REQUEST, 0x20, 0);
 		allowed = false;
 		break;
 	default:
-- 
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/