linux-kernel - Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/4] dma-buf: document fd flags and O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPM=9twSZJyYcNwDwaC5eSy7fXNaRBGTZZ6F2K3D8AeQdYtgww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2012 10:51:51 +0000
From:	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Cc:	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	DRI Development <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] [PATCH 4/4] dma-buf: document fd flags and
 O_CLOEXEC requirement

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> wrote:
> Otherwise subsystems will get this wrong and end up with and second
> export ioctl with the flag and O_CLOEXEC support added.

Its not actually dma_buf_export that takes the O_CLOEXEC flag its dma_buf_fd

I'm not sure how blindly we should be passing flags in from userspace
to these, like O_NONBLOCK or perms flags.

Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/