[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F672629.60606@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:57:22 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 15/26] sched, numa: Implement hotplug hooks
On 03/19/2012 05:49 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 17:46 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> + get_online_cpus();
>>> + cpu_notifier(numa_hotplug, 0);
>>
>>
>> ABBA deadlock!
>>
> Yeah, I know.. luckily it can't actually happen since early_initcalls
> are pre-smp. I could just leave out the get_online_cpus() thing.
>
Oh numa_init() is an early_initcall? Ok, I didn't observe.
In that case, its fine either way, with or without get_online_cpus()
stuff.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists