[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332163776.18960.337.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:29:36 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:04 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> For the niche there's the
> numactl, cpusets, and all sort of bindings already. No need of more
> niche, that is pure kernel API pollution in my view, the niche has all
> its hard tools it needs already.
Not quite, I've heard that some HPC people would very much like to relax
some of that hard binding because its just as big a pain for them as it
is for kvm.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists