[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120319160249.GA4910@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:02:49 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
James Morris <james.l.morris@...cle.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
Djalal Harouni <tixxdz@...ndz.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] exec_id/exit_signal fixes
Andrew, these changes are orthogonal to
"CLONE_PARENT shouldn't allow to set ->exit_signal" in -mm.
Please review/comment. The patches are really simple I hope,
but with or without them I do not understand eligible_child().
/* Wait for all children (clone and not) if __WALL is set;
* otherwise, wait for clone children *only* if __WCLONE is
* set; otherwise, wait for non-clone children *only*. (Note:
* A "clone" child here is one that reports to its parent
* using a signal other than SIGCHLD.) */
if (((p->exit_signal != SIGCHLD) ^ !!(wo->wo_flags & __WCLONE))
&& !(wo->wo_flags & __WALL))
return 0;
OK, but exec/exit can change ->exit_signal "in between".
For example. The parent clones the !SIGCHLD child and does
do_wait(__WCLONE). The child execs. The parent still sleeps until
child exits but do_wait() returns ECHILD. And more, this also
depends on who does exec in mt case.
Or the parent execs. In this case eligible_child() depends on when
the child exits, before or after exec.
Anyway, the current check in exit_notify() is wrong, 2/2 tries to
fix this. But both patches add the (hopefully minor) user-visible
changes wrt eligible_child().
Really, I think de_thread() should set ->exit_signal = SIGCHLD for
each child. This looks simple and understandable, and with the
CLONE_PARENT change above we can kill self_exec_id/parent_exec_id.
May be de_thread() should also do __wake_up_parent() if it changes
->exit_signal. Or perhaps we should change eligible_child() to check
p->cloned_with_not_SIGCHLD. I dunno. I hope this doesn't matter
and nobody cares.
OTOH, I never understood why we should reset ->exit_signal if the
child execs but the parent is still the same.
3/3 is offtopic minor cleanup. Imho setmax_mm_hiwater_rss() in
de_thread() looks strange.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists