[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <79ac1725-6aa2-4d67-8b59-cbf752ea9f3e@zmail13.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:16:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
kosaki motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, amwang@...hat.com, jslaby@...e.cz,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, joe korty <joe.korty@...r.com>,
dhowells@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 1/3] mqueue: revert bump up DFLT_*MAX
----- Original Message -----
> On 3/14/2012 5:45 PM, Doug Ledford wrote:
> > On 03/14/2012 05:38 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >> On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 17:28:33 -0400
> >> Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> This has obviously fallen through the cracks.
> >>
> >> It sure has. Please dig out whatever is the currently favored
> >> patchset, refresh, retest and resend, with changelogging which
> >> fully
> >> covers the reasoning and decision process?
> >
> > OK, completely redoing patch set then against current Linus tree.
> >
> > Motohiro, would you be so kind as to resend my your patches that
> > went on
> > top of mine and I'll create a complete patch set?
>
> I'm sorry. I already have a rebased patch. but I haven't posted. I
> have to
> hurry.
Actually, I already pulled them from the lkml archives and fixed up
the one patch that didn't apply cleanly. The only reason I haven't
sent the entire patchset out yet is that I'm writing a test/verification
app to go along with it.
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD
http://people.redhat.com/dledford
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists