[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJOA=zP1HHqBNS4V2dN=Q9oOcOErQj8W__fB_qRyZeNLBk7VJg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:56:11 -0700
From: "Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>
To: Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
patches@...aro.org, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Deepak Saxena <dsaxena@...aro.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 8:28 PM, Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 11:11 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>
>> The common clock framework defines a common struct clk useful across
>> most platforms as well as an implementation of the clk api that drivers
>> can use safely for managing clocks.
>>
>> The net result is consolidation of many different struct clk definitions
>> and platform-specific clock framework implementations.
>>
>> This patch introduces the common struct clk, struct clk_ops and an
>> implementation of the well-known clock api in include/clk/clk.h.
>> Platforms may define their own hardware-specific clock structure and
>> their own clock operation callbacks, so long as it wraps an instance of
>> struct clk_hw.
>>
>> See Documentation/clk.txt for more details.
>>
>> This patch is based on the work of Jeremy Kerr, which in turn was based
>> on the work of Ben Herrenschmidt.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@...com>
>> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner<tglx@...utronix.de>
>> Tested-by: Andrew Lunn<andrew@...n.ch>
>> Reviewed-by: Rob Herring<rob.herring<at> Â calxeda.com>
>> Cc: Russell King<linux@....linux.org.uk>
>> Cc: Jeremy Kerr<jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>
>> Cc: Arnd Bergman<arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Paul Walmsley<paul@...an.com>
>> Cc: Shawn Guo<shawn.guo@...escale.com>
>> Cc: Sascha Hauer<s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
>> Cc: Richard Zhao<richard.zhao@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Saravana Kannan<skannan@...eaurora.org>
>> Cc: Magnus Damm<magnus.damm@...il.com>
>> Cc: Mark Brown<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij<linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>
>> Cc: Stephen Boyd<sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> Cc: Amit Kucheria<amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Deepak Saxena<dsaxena@...aro.org>
>> Cc: Grant Likely<grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>> ---
>
>
> Mike,
>
> Thanks for the patches! Glad to see that it's finally getting in! I sent a
> request for a minor change as a reply to the v5 series (since it had more
> context). Can you please take a look at that and let me know if you can send
> out a v8 or a patch on top of this to do that?
Hi Saravana,
I'm not sending a v8 series since Arnd has taken in v7 for the 3.4 merge window.
I'm formulating a reply to your v5 queries, but I'm not done looking
at the implications of the initializer stuff. Lets keep the technical
discussion in that thread for now.
Regards,
Mike
>
> Thanks,
> Saravana
>
> --
> Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists