linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 19 Mar 2012 12:00:13 -0700
From:	"Turquette, Mike" <mturquette@...com>
To:	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
Cc:	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	patches@...aro.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Saravana Kannan <skannan@...eaurora.org>,
	linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
	Arnd Bergman <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/3] clk: introduce the common clock framework

On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> Another trivial comment.  But if there is an incremental patch, maybe
> consider to include it.
>
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:11:19PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote:
> ...
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DISABLE_UNUSED
>> +static int clk_disable_unused(void)
>> +{
>> +     struct clk *clk;
>> +     struct hlist_node *tmp;
>> +
>> +     mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
>> +
>> +     hlist_for_each_entry(clk, tmp, &clk_root_list, child_node)
>> +             clk_disable_unused_subtree(clk);
>> +
>> +     hlist_for_each_entry(clk, tmp, &clk_orphan_list, child_node)
>> +             clk_disable_unused_subtree(clk);
>> +
>> +     mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
>> +
>> +     return 0;
>> +}
>> +late_initcall(clk_disable_unused);
>> +#else
>> +static inline int clk_disable_unused(struct clk *clk) { return 0; }
>
> This #else block seems completely unnecessary to me.
>
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DISABLE_UNUSED */

Oops.  This is a leftover from when there was a separate
drivers/clk/clk-debug.c which implemented this stuff.  I'll make a
cleanup series and roll all these little things into it.

Thanks,
Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/