[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332187616.18960.391.camel@twins>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 21:06:56 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Dan Smith <danms@...ibm.com>,
Bharata B Rao <bharata.rao@...il.com>,
Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@...com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/26] sched/numa
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 14:40 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > I agree with this, but it's really widespread throughout the kernel,
> > from interrupts to work items to background threads. It needs to be
> > solved generically (IIRC vhost has some accouting fix for a similar issue).
>
> Exactly.
The fact that we all agree its a problem and that nobody has a sane idea
on how to solve it might argue against this.
Also, the fact that there's existing ugly isn't excuse to stop worrying
about it and add more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists