[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120319224649.GA7679@perelman.Home>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:46:49 -0700
From: Gerard Snitselaar <dev@...tselaar.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, fmhess@...rs.sourceforge.net,
abbotti@....co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: comedi: resolve section mismatch in s626
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:43:25AM -0700, Gerard Snitselaar wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 09:31:03AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> >
> > Ick, why is this loop even needed? We are only here if the pci device
> > is present in the system so this shouldn't be needed at all, right?
> >
> > Or is this a bit more complex than I am making it out to be?
> >
> > greg k-h
>
> Most likely not. I will take a look at some of the other drivers in
> comedi and see how the attach code looks there. I believe the code
> section in hpdi_attach() was written by the same person. Unfortunately
> I don't have a device to actually play around and see what changes are
> doing.
>
I looked at this a bit more. It looks like they lose visibility to the
pci_dev structure.
*_probe()
comedi_pci_auto_config() pci_dev
comedi_auto_config() pci_dev->dev
comedi_device_attach() ??
driv->attach() ?? <= iterate through pci devices.
Most of the examples I have looked at so far use for_each_pci_dev() to
find the device, and s626 shortcuts it a bit by directly making calls
to pci_get_subsys() with specific ids. They all verify they have the
right device by checking the bus and slot that are grabbed from the
pci_dev in comedi_pci_auto_config() and passed down.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists