[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120319224746.GK19594@moon>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 02:47:46 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] c/r: prctl: Add ability to set new
mm_struct::exe_file
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:41:36PM +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> >
> > Actually I liked multi-shot version more but Matt arguments convinced
> > me that one-short fashion is more "secure" in terms of overall kernel
> > state and potential transitions/changes of this /proc/pid/exe symlink.
> >
> > At least with one-shot version the admin may be sure that the symlink
> > is never changed more than once, ever.
> >
>
> And changing it once does not harm security?
> I'm sure that rootkit writers will like this feature...
The one-shot limits the amount of transitions, but you still
have to obtain CAP_SYS_RESOURCE before you'll be able to change
this symlink (ie it's not 'anyone-can-change-it' feature).
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists