[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203191549150.10984@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@...il.com>
cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch -next 1/2] drivers, samsung-laptop: fix initialization
of sabi_data in sabi_set_commandb
On Wed, 14 Mar 2012, Corentin Chary wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:59 AM, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com> wrote:
> > Fields d0, d1, d2, and d3 are members of an anonymous struct inside an
> > anonymous union inside struct sabi_data. Initialization must be done by
> > wrapping the anonymous union and structs with brackets to avoid a build
> > error:
> >
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c: In function ‘sabi_set_commandb’:
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c:433: error: unknown field ‘d0’ specified in initializer
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c:433: warning: missing braces around initializer
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c:433: warning: (near initialization for ‘in.<anonymous>’)
> > ...
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
> > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
> > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/samsung-laptop.c
> > @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ exit:
> > static int sabi_set_commandb(struct samsung_laptop *samsung,
> > u16 command, u8 data)
> > {
> > - struct sabi_data in = { .d0 = 0, .d1 = 0, .d2 = 0, .d3 = 0 };
> > + struct sabi_data in = { { { .d0 = 0, .d1 = 0, .d2 = 0, .d3 = 0 } } };
> >
> > in.data[0] = data;
> > return sabi_command(samsung, command, &in, NULL);
>
>
> Acked-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@...aif.net>
>
> David, just in case, I found this mail in my spam folder, probably
> because your smtp server is not allowed to send @google.com mails.
>
> Also, with which version of gcc is this necessary ? Old version worked
> with 4.5 and 4.6.
>
> Matthew, could you merge that one and the other directly in your tree ? Thanks
Matthew, this is still missing from linux-next as of today's tree. Ping
on this?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists