[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F67D6BA.2000500@windriver.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:00:42 -0500
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] kgdb: x86: Detach gdb if machine shuts down or reboots
On 03/19/2012 08:49 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>
> An arch-independent hook has its advantages, no question. Maybe we
> should just start this way and then evolved on top as needed.
>
Sounds good to me. I added the reboot notifier patch into the merge queue for kgdb/kdb.
> I was wondering why those other archs do not use the notifier. Maybe one
> motivation is to avoid that too much code is excluded from the debugger
> by detaching too early. Could possibly be addressed by making
> detach-on-reboot runtime configurable.
There really isn't a whole lot of code between reboot hook invoked from kernel_restart_prepare(), and the place where the reset is invoked. Specifically it looked like:
usermodehelper_disable();
device_shutdown();
syscore_shutdown();
machine_restart(cmd);
Attached is the patch you asked for the conditional behavior with respect to the reboot hook. This also implements the ability to stop on a reboot that is not a panic().
Cheers,
Jason.
View attachment "0001-kgdb-debug_core-add-the-ability-to-control-the-reboo.patch" of type "text/x-diff" (3495 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists