linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 6/6] workqueue: use kmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1332238884-6237-7-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2012 18:21:24 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 6/6] workqueue: use kmalloc_align() instead of hacking

kmalloc_align() makes the code simpler.

Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |   23 +++++------------------
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 5abf42f..beec5fd 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -2897,20 +2897,9 @@ static int alloc_cwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
 		wq->cpu_wq.pcpu = __alloc_percpu(size, align);
-	else {
-		void *ptr;
-
-		/*
-		 * Allocate enough room to align cwq and put an extra
-		 * pointer at the end pointing back to the originally
-		 * allocated pointer which will be used for free.
-		 */
-		ptr = kzalloc(size + align + sizeof(void *), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (ptr) {
-			wq->cpu_wq.single = PTR_ALIGN(ptr, align);
-			*(void **)(wq->cpu_wq.single + 1) = ptr;
-		}
-	}
+	else
+		wq->cpu_wq.single = kmalloc_align(size,
+				GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO, align);
 
 	/* just in case, make sure it's actually aligned */
 	BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(wq->cpu_wq.v, align));
@@ -2921,10 +2910,8 @@ static void free_cwqs(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
 {
 	if (!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND))
 		free_percpu(wq->cpu_wq.pcpu);
-	else if (wq->cpu_wq.single) {
-		/* the pointer to free is stored right after the cwq */
-		kfree(*(void **)(wq->cpu_wq.single + 1));
-	}
+	else if (wq->cpu_wq.single)
+		kfree(wq->cpu_wq.single);
 }
 
 static int wq_clamp_max_active(int max_active, unsigned int flags,
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/