[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAHN_R3mFzmtCey_0JEHp=EAGh1sb87szpsKD_JkFwwYLCnKug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 19:08:39 +0530
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Jamie Lokier <jamie@...reable.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] -mm/linux-next: procfs: Mark thread stack correctly in proc/<pid>/maps
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:46 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Mar 2012 23:04:36 +0530
> Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh.poyarekar@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> Following is the updated patch with requested changes incorporated.
>
> Boy, that's a lot of changes (below). What does it all do?
>
Hi,
Since this patch was included in the -mm tree on March 14th, I assumed
that linux-next would get the patch in today's merge, but it hasn't.
Is there something I am missing? Does the patch need additional
review/acks that I need to request for?
Thanks,
Siddhesh
Thanks,
Siddhesh
--
Siddhesh Poyarekar
http://siddhesh.in
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists