| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CADvmyBdAzmBUC-uhhU9=HcyhAk214bw5_xZtaQxWU223THwkQA@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 09:33:38 +0800 From: "peter.meng" <mengsanshui@...il.com> To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: How about the MMC/SDIO host controller standard under Linux ? Thanks David On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 8:29 AM, David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:39:29AM +0800, peter.meng wrote: > >> I see the drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h define the common register as >> describe within >> Part_A2_SD_Host_Controller_Simplified_Specification_Ver3.00_Final_110225.pdf >> In this case all command related access register is common .(sdhci-xxx.c) >> Does this mean all sdhci-xxx.c that will support SD host controller standard ? > >> I see most code such as s3cmci.c ,msm_sdcc.c that has their only >> private register that access by such as mmc_host_ops->request function >> . >> I want to know whether this mean these host controller doesn't support >> SD host controller standard ? > > There are numerous SD host controllers that aren't SDHCI. > > David > > -- > Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists