| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 20:59:57 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> To: Ashay Rane <ashay.r@...il.com> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ashay Rane <ashay.rane@...c.utexas.edu> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix number of events displayed in header On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 14:51 -0500, Ashay Rane wrote: > The problem I am seeing is that the `perf record' output does not > comform with the output of `perf stat'. For example, for `hackbench 10 > process 1000', I see 19 x 10^9 cycles reported by `perf stat'. > However, `perf report -n' prints "Events: 2K cycles" and `perf report > -n --dso hackbench' prints "Events: 47 cycles". Ah, read it as if perf report is saying: Samples: 47 of event: cycles. That is, its telling you the cycles event had 47 overflows causing 47 samples to be taken (IP, etc..) and written out. The point of reporting this number is that it puts the accuracy of the percentages into perspective. The more samples, the greater the coverage and more accurate the actual percentage of time spend in the various functions. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists