linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <873992zy5u.fsf@ti.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2012 15:48:45 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org>
Cc:	Robert Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>, len.brown@...el.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl, robherring2@...il.com,
	Baohua.Song@....com, amit.kucheria@...aro.org,
	nicolas.ferre@...el.com, linux@...im.org.za, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
	amit.kachhap@...aro.org, magnus.damm@...il.com, nsekhar@...com,
	daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, mturquette@...aro.org,
	vincent.guittot@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...aro.org, deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
	linux@....linux.org.uk, jean.pihet@...oldbits.com,
	venki@...gle.com, ccross@...gle.com, g.trinabh@...il.com,
	kernel@...tstofly.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, jon-hunter@...com,
	tony@...mide.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality

Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@...aro.org> writes:

> On Tuesday 20 March 2012, Robert Lee wrote:
>> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform 
>> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
>> disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into 
>> cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable().
>> 
>> These changes have been pulled into linux-next.
>> 
>> Len, Andrew, can a request be made for Linus to pull these changes?
>
> FWIW, Len seems to be rather inactive on the kernel mailing list right
> now and generally not very interested in anything outside of x86 and
> acpi. If he doesn't reply in the next few days and Andrew also isn't
> interested in handling these patches, I'd suggest you just send the pull
> request to Linus, with Len on Cc and explain that you tried to send
> them through him but gave up in the end.

FWIW, I have not had good luck getting response for proposed core
CPUidle changes either:

        http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/19/374

Maybe it's time that drivers/cpuidle gets a maintainer.  With lots of
discussions of scheduler changes that affect load estimation, I suspect
we're all going to have a bit of CPUidle work to do in the
not-so-distant future.
 
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/