[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332227493.12110.21.camel@vkoul-udesk3>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:41:33 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
'Jassi Brar' <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] dmaengine: add a slave parameter to
__dma_request_channel()
On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 17:32 +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> Sure. In the datasheet we have: to configure a channel for client 1 write
> value X to register A and value Y to register B. That's it. One of them is
> really just a magic slave ID. Another one has several fields with values
> like bus width and transfer size. They could be passed "properly," but
> since those fields also vary between DMAC versions, it is easier to just
> fix the whole register value per client and pass it from the platform
> data. In any case, at least the slave ID is really just a constant, that
> cannot be calculated and has to be passed from platform data.
I think I like the idea of having the these slave IDs coming from
platform map. That way drivers can be agnostic...
--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists