[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120321093504.GA12118@shlinux2.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:35:06 +0800
From: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@...escale.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: "linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"grant.likely@...retlab.ca" <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"linus.walleij@...ricsson.com" <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@...escale.com>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"dongas86@...il.com" <dongas86@...il.com>,
"shawn.guo@...aro.org" <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
"thomas.abraham@...aro.org" <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
"tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"sjg@...omium.org" <sjg@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 6/6] pinctrl: tegra: Add complete device tree support
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:44:39AM +0800, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Implement pinctrl_ops dt_node_to_map() and dt_free_map(). These allow
> complete specification of the desired pinmux configuration using device
> tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
> ---
> v2: Rebase on of_property_for_each_string() API changes.
> ---
Nice code and a good example to people.
A small suggestion below:
> +static int add_map_configs(struct pinctrl_map **map, unsigned *num_maps,
> + const char *group, unsigned long *configs,
> + unsigned num_configs)
> +{
> + unsigned i = *num_maps;
> + unsigned long *dup_configs;
> + int ret;
> +
> + dup_configs = kmemdup(configs, num_configs * sizeof(*dup_configs),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dup_configs)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + ret = add_map(map, num_maps);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + (*map)[i].type = PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_GROUP;
It still does not support PIN_MAP_TYPE_CONFIGS_PIN, right?
> + for_each_child_of_node(np_config, np) {
> + ret = of_property_read_string(np, "nvidia,function", &function);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + function = NULL;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cfg_params); i++) {
> + ret = of_property_read_u32(np, cfg_params[i].property,
> + &val);
> + if (!ret) {
> + config = TEGRA_PINCONF_PACK(
> + cfg_params[i].param, val);
> + ret = add_config(&configs, &num_configs,
> + config);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto error;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + of_property_for_each_string(np, "nvidia,pins", prop, group) {
If we calculate out the strings count and allocate corresponding size array, we may not
need to keep krealloc the maps and configs array size for each entry.
And this may be a little higher efficient.
Regards
Dong Aisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists