[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87wr6evmnn.fsf@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 17:10:52 -0700
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
To: Robert Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org>
Cc: len.brown@...el.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, rjw@...k.pl,
robherring2@...il.com, Baohua.Song@....com,
amit.kucheria@...aro.org, nicolas.ferre@...el.com,
linux@...im.org.za, kgene.kim@...sung.com, amit.kachhap@...aro.org,
magnus.damm@...il.com, nsekhar@...com, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
mturquette@...aro.org, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
arnd.bergmann@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
patches@...aro.org, deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, nicolas.pitre@...aro.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, jean.pihet@...oldbits.com,
venki@...gle.com, ccross@...gle.com, g.trinabh@...il.com,
kernel@...tstofly.org, lethal@...ux-sh.org, jon-hunter@...com,
tony@...mide.com, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/8] Consolidate cpuidle functionality
Hi Rob,
Robert Lee <rob.lee@...aro.org> writes:
> This patch series moves various functionality duplicated in platform
> cpuidle drivers to the core cpuidle driver. Also, the platform irq
> disabling was removed as it appears that all calls into
> cpuidle_call_idle will have already called local_irq_disable().
>
> These changes have been pulled into linux-next.
>
> Len, Andrew, can a request be made for Linus to pull these changes?
>
> Acked-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@...com> (v6)
> Tested-by: Jean Pihet<j-pihet@...com> (v6, omap3)
> Tested-by: Amit Daniel<amit.kachhap@...aro.org> (v6, Exynos4)
> Tested-by: Robert Lee<rob.lee@...aro.org> (imx51, imx6q)
Note that there's a space missing between the name and email in these
tags (and for Deepthi's below also.) That seems to exist in all the
patches.
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
For my Reviewed-by, it only applies to the core code and the OMAP
changes. I haven't reviewed the other platform-specific drivers. I
believe the same applies to Jean Pihet who works with me on OMAP.
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Deepthi Dharwar<deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> (core cpuidle only)
Looks like you never heard from anyone actively working on at91,
shmobile, kirwood or davinci.
I'm not sure we should merge those platform-specific changes without an
ack from those platform maintainers.
For 3.4, maybe we should just merge the core code and the platforms that
have been reviewed/ack'd, and for 3.5, spent some time nagging the other
platform maintainers to review and test.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists