[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1332341381.7893.17.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 07:49:41 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: Patch workqueue: create new slab cache instead of hacking
On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 09:12 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> How about this instead?
>
> Subject: workqueues: Use new kmem cache to get aligned memory for workqueues
>
> The workqueue logic currently improvises by doing a kmalloc allocation and
> then aligning the object. Create a slab cache for that purpose with the
> proper alignment instead.
>
> Cleans up the code and makes things much simpler. No need anymore to carry
> an additional pointer to the beginning of the kmalloc object.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Creating a dedicated cache for few objects ? Thats a lot of overhead, at
least for SLAB (no merges of caches)
By the way network stack also wants to align struct net_device (in
function alloc_netdev_mqs(), and uses a custom code.
In this case, as the size of net_device is not constant, we use standard
kzalloc().
No idea why NETDEV_ALIGN is 32 ... Oh well, some old constant instead of
L1_CACHE_BYTES ...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists