[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120321151119.GC21163@infradead.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:11:19 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, mingo@...e.hu,
paulus@...ba.org, cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf, tool: Add new event group management
Em Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:42:14AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:44:41PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > If so, we need some option like:
> >
> > perf record -e "{cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references}:1"
> >
> > to mean, only sample on cpu-clock but use PERF_SAMPLE_READ and
> > PERF_FORMAT_GROUP to read all siblings on every cpu-clock sample.
> >
> > Now the disadvantage is that {} needs quotes on bash, the advantage is
> > that its completely natural on how to construct groups, without weird
> > --group/--group parsed. Also it provides a place for group modifiers.
>
> how about '=group' keyword followed by ':' modifier
> perf record -e "cpu-clock,cache-misses,cache-references=group:1"
>
> or '=$groupname' and use the group name in output like
> perf stat -e "task-clock,context-switches=krava:1" ls
>
> Performance counter stats for 'ls':
>
> 1.003695 task-clock/krava # 0.083 CPUs utilized
> 0 context-switches/krava # 0.000 K/sec
>
Humm, interesting, perhaps putting the group name before the =event_list
will be more intuitive?
I.e.:
perf stat -e "krava=task-clock,context-switches:1" ls
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists