linux-kernel - [PATCH 8/8] ext2: introduce own superblock dirty flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1332346475-1441-9-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:14:35 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc:	Ext4 Mailing List <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Maling List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 8/8] ext2: introduce own superblock dirty flag

From: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>

We finally do not need VFS's 's_dirt' flag in ext2 - introduce our own
's_dirty' flag instead.

Note: the final goal is to get rid of the 'sync_supers()' kernel thread which
wakes up every 5 seconds and even if there is nothing to do. Thus, we are
pushing superblock management from VFS down to file-systems.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@...ux.intel.com>
---
 fs/ext2/super.c            |   16 ++++++++--------
 include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h |    1 +
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext2/super.c b/fs/ext2/super.c
index 4eee017..bb12634 100644
--- a/fs/ext2/super.c
+++ b/fs/ext2/super.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ static void ext2_sync_super(struct super_block *sb, struct ext2_super_block *es,
 {
 	struct ext2_sb_info *sbi = EXT2_SB(sb);
 
-	sb->s_dirt = 0;
+	sbi->s_dirty = 0;
 	/*
 	 * Make sure we first mark the superblock as clean and then start
 	 * writing it out.
@@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ void ext2_write_super(struct super_block *sb)
 	if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY))
 		ext2_sync_fs(sb, 1);
 	else {
-		sb->s_dirt = 0;
+		EXT2_SB(sb)->s_dirty = 0;
 		smp_wmb();
 	}
 }
@@ -1239,7 +1239,7 @@ static void write_super(struct work_struct *work)
 	kfree(sbwork);
 
 	smp_rmb();
-	if (sb->s_dirt)
+	if (EXT2_SB(sb)->s_dirty)
 		return;
 
 	ext2_write_super(sb);
@@ -1251,12 +1251,12 @@ void ext2_mark_super_dirty(struct super_block *sb)
 	struct sb_delayed_work *sbwork;
 	unsigned long delay;
 
-	/* Make sure we see 's_dirt' changes ASAP */
+	/* Make sure we see 's_dirty' changes ASAP */
 	smp_rmb();
-	if (sb->s_dirt == 1)
+	if (sbi->s_dirty == 1)
 		return;
-	sb->s_dirt = 1;
-	/* Make other CPUs see the 's_dirt' change as soon as possible */
+	sbi->s_dirty = 1;
+	/* Make other CPUs see the 's_dirty' change as soon as possible */
 	smp_wmb();
 
 	sbwork = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sb_delayed_work), GFP_NOFS);
@@ -1266,7 +1266,7 @@ void ext2_mark_super_dirty(struct super_block *sb)
 		 * trouble anyway, and the SB will be written out on unmount or
 		 * we may be luckier next time it is marked as dirty.
 		 */
-		sb->s_dirt = 2;
+		sbi->s_dirty = 2;
 		return;
 	}
 
diff --git a/include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h
index 75aa40e..5938744 100644
--- a/include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h
+++ b/include/linux/ext2_fs_sb.h
@@ -99,6 +99,7 @@ struct ext2_sb_info {
 	u32 s_next_generation;
 	unsigned long s_dir_count;
 	u8 *s_debts;
+	int s_dirty;
 	/* workqueue for synchronizing the superblock */
 	struct workqueue_struct *sync_super_wq;
 	struct percpu_counter s_freeblocks_counter;
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/