linux-kernel - Re: [patch] Add design document for UBIFS secure deletion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1332346804.14983.23.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:20:04 +0200
From:	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To:	Joel Reardon <joel@...mbassador.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] Add design document for UBIFS secure deletion

On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:26 +0100, Joel Reardon wrote:
> p.s., I'm new to this git; git format-patch gives me one patch per commit,
> which is a pity for a commit that e.g, fixes a typo. Format-patch
> doesn't obviously report how to produce unified patches. Creating a new
> branch, applying the patches, committing, and generating a new patch seems
> too much overkill but I've seen it proposed. Simpler way?

The --amend option of git commit allows you to update the current HEAD
commit. I could not really understand which other questions you ask, but
if you have a specific question - I may try to help.

-- 
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)