linux-kernel - [RESEND PATCH 2/3] genirq: Get rid of unneeded force parameter in irq_finalize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120321162234.GP24806@dhcp-26-207.brq.redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 17:22:35 +0100
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH 2/3] genirq: Get rid of unneeded force parameter in
 irq_finalize_oneshot()

The only place irq_finalize_oneshot() is called with force parameter set
is the threaded handler error exit path. But IRQTF_RUNTHREAD is dropped
at this point and irq_wake_thread() is not going to reset it again,
since PF_EXITING is set for this thread already. So irq_finalize_oneshot()
will drop the thread's bit in threads_oneshot anyway and hence the force
parameter is superfluous.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/irq/manage.c |   10 +++++-----
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c
index b0ccd1a..bf606a5 100644
--- a/kernel/irq/manage.c
+++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ static int irq_wait_for_interrupt(struct irqaction *action)
  * is marked MASKED.
  */
 static void irq_finalize_oneshot(struct irq_desc *desc,
-				 struct irqaction *action, bool force)
+				 struct irqaction *action)
 {
 	if (!(desc->istate & IRQS_ONESHOT))
 		return;
@@ -679,7 +679,7 @@ again:
 	 * we would clear the threads_oneshot bit of this thread which
 	 * was just set.
 	 */
-	if (!force && test_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
+	if (test_bit(IRQTF_RUNTHREAD, &action->thread_flags))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	desc->threads_oneshot &= ~action->thread_mask;
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@ irq_forced_thread_fn(struct irq_desc *desc, struct irqaction *action)
 
 	local_bh_disable();
 	ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
-	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action, false);
+	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action);
 	local_bh_enable();
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -755,7 +755,7 @@ static irqreturn_t irq_thread_fn(struct irq_desc *desc,
 	irqreturn_t ret;
 
 	ret = action->thread_fn(action->irq, action->dev_id);
-	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action, false);
+	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -844,7 +844,7 @@ void exit_irq_thread(void)
 		wake_threads_waitq(desc);
 
 	/* Prevent a stale desc->threads_oneshot */
-	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action, true);
+	irq_finalize_oneshot(desc, action);
 }
 
 static void irq_setup_forced_threading(struct irqaction *new)
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/