linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/apic_ops: Replace apic_ops with x86_apic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Mar 2012 12:22:23 -0400
From:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, jwboyer@...hat.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/apic_ops: Replace apic_ops with x86_apic_ops.

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 07:31:51PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> <konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> > . which makes the code fit within the rest of the x86_ops functions.
> > +
> > +struct x86_apic_ops x86_apic = {
> > +       .init = native_ioapic_init_mappings,
> > +       .read = native_ioapic_read,
> > +       .write = native_ioapic_write,
> > +       .modify = native_ioapic_modify,
> > +};
> 
> x86_ioapic_ops and x86_ioapic would be better?

It certainly would. Thank you for the suggestion!
> 
> Yinghai
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/