[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2EF88150C0EF2C43A218742ED384C1BC0FC84327@IRVEXCHMB08.corp.ad.broadcom.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 01:56:47 +0000
From: "Michael J. Wang" <mjwang@...adcom.com>
To: "Yong Zhang" <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
cc: "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
"Michael J. Wang" <mjwang@...adcom.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] scheduler: minor improvement to
pick_next_highest_task_rt in linux-3.3
Ah, I see. Forgot about the length of my comment line.
Should I reformat my patch and send it again?
Thanks,
Michael
-----Original Message-----
From: Yong Zhang [mailto:yong.zhang0@...il.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:41 PM
To: Michael J. Wang
Cc: mingo@...e.hu; peterz@...radead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] scheduler: minor improvement to pick_next_highest_task_rt in linux-3.3
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:26:19PM +0000, Michael J. Wang wrote:
> From: Michael J Wang <mjwang@...adcom.com>
>
> Avoid extra work by continuing on to the next rt_rq if the highest prio task in current rt_rq is the same priority as our candidate task.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael J Wang <mjwang@...adcom.com>
>
> ---
>
> More detailed explanation: if next is not NULL, then we have found a candidate task, and its priority is next->prio. Now we are looking for an even higher priority task in the other rt_rq's. idx is the highest priority in the current candidate rt_rq. In the current 3.3 code, if idx is equal to next->prio, we would start scanning the tasks in that rt_rq and replace the current candidate task with a task from that rt_rq. But the new task would only have a priority that is equal to our previous candidate task, so we have not advanced our goal of finding a higher prio task. So we should avoid the extra work by continuing on to the next rt_rq if idx is equal to next->prio.
>
You should limit characters of each line to 80 if possible.
And before sending you patch, linux-source/scripts/checkpatch.pl maybe
give you some clues whether there is some warning/error. If there are,
fix them.
Only for what your patch wants to show:
Reviewed-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Thanks,
Yong
> --- linux-3.3/kernel/sched/rt.c.orig 2012-03-18 16:15:34.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-3.3/kernel/sched/rt.c 2012-03-19 14:52:54.585391702 -0700
> @@ -1403,7 +1403,7 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_hig
> next_idx:
> if (idx >= MAX_RT_PRIO)
> continue;
> - if (next && next->prio < idx)
> + if (next && next->prio <= idx)
> continue;
> list_for_each_entry(rt_se, array->queue + idx, run_list) {
> struct task_struct *p;
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
Only stand for myself
Powered by blists - more mailing lists