[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120321211448.676904040@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:14:53 -0700
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, Simon Kirby <sim@...nation.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 5/8] tcp: fix syncookie regression
3.0-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
[ Upstream commit dfd25ffffc132c00070eed64200e8950da5d7e9d ]
commit ea4fc0d619 (ipv4: Don't use rt->rt_{src,dst} in ip_queue_xmit())
added a serious regression on synflood handling.
Simon Kirby discovered a successful connection was delayed by 20 seconds
before being responsive.
In my tests, I discovered that xmit frames were lost, and needed ~4
retransmits and a socket dst rebuild before being really sent.
In case of syncookie initiated connection, we use a different path to
initialize the socket dst, and inet->cork.fl.u.ip4 is left cleared.
As ip_queue_xmit() now depends on inet flow being setup, fix this by
copying the temp flowi4 we use in cookie_v4_check().
Reported-by: Simon Kirby <sim@...nation.com>
Bisected-by: Simon Kirby <sim@...nation.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Tested-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/syncookies.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/syncookies.c
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock
struct rtable *rt;
__u8 rcv_wscale;
bool ecn_ok = false;
+ struct flowi4 fl4;
if (!sysctl_tcp_syncookies || !th->ack || th->rst)
goto out;
@@ -344,20 +345,16 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock
* hasn't changed since we received the original syn, but I see
* no easy way to do this.
*/
- {
- struct flowi4 fl4;
-
- flowi4_init_output(&fl4, 0, sk->sk_mark, RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk),
- RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP,
- inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk),
- (opt && opt->srr) ? opt->faddr : ireq->rmt_addr,
- ireq->loc_addr, th->source, th->dest);
- security_req_classify_flow(req, flowi4_to_flowi(&fl4));
- rt = ip_route_output_key(sock_net(sk), &fl4);
- if (IS_ERR(rt)) {
- reqsk_free(req);
- goto out;
- }
+ flowi4_init_output(&fl4, 0, sk->sk_mark, RT_CONN_FLAGS(sk),
+ RT_SCOPE_UNIVERSE, IPPROTO_TCP,
+ inet_sk_flowi_flags(sk),
+ (opt && opt->srr) ? opt->faddr : ireq->rmt_addr,
+ ireq->loc_addr, th->source, th->dest);
+ security_req_classify_flow(req, flowi4_to_flowi(&fl4));
+ rt = ip_route_output_key(sock_net(sk), &fl4);
+ if (IS_ERR(rt)) {
+ reqsk_free(req);
+ goto out;
}
/* Try to redo what tcp_v4_send_synack did. */
@@ -371,5 +368,10 @@ struct sock *cookie_v4_check(struct sock
ireq->rcv_wscale = rcv_wscale;
ret = get_cookie_sock(sk, skb, req, &rt->dst);
+ /* ip_queue_xmit() depends on our flow being setup
+ * Normal sockets get it right from inet_csk_route_child_sock()
+ */
+ if (ret)
+ inet_sk(ret)->cork.fl.u.ip4 = fl4;
out: return ret;
}
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1454,9 +1454,13 @@ struct sock *tcp_v4_syn_recv_sock(struct
inet_csk(newsk)->icsk_ext_hdr_len = inet_opt->opt.optlen;
newinet->inet_id = newtp->write_seq ^ jiffies;
- if (!dst && (dst = inet_csk_route_child_sock(sk, newsk, req)) == NULL)
- goto put_and_exit;
-
+ if (!dst) {
+ dst = inet_csk_route_child_sock(sk, newsk, req);
+ if (!dst)
+ goto put_and_exit;
+ } else {
+ /* syncookie case : see end of cookie_v4_check() */
+ }
sk_setup_caps(newsk, dst);
tcp_mtup_init(newsk);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists