[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F695C3F.3000406@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:42:39 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: glommer@...allels.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, rni@...gle.com,
ctalbott@...gle.com, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] cgroup: convert memcg controller to the new cftype
interface
(2012/03/20 1:10), Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:26:02PM +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
>>> +CGROUP_SUBSYS_CFTYPES_COND(mem_cgroup_subsys, memsw_cgroup_files,
>>> + really_do_swap_account);
>>
>>
>> I'm sorry but why you use really_do_swap_account instead of do_swap_account ?
>
> Because do_swap_account is initialized too late.
> CGROUP_SUBSYS_CFTYPES() are processed via fs_initcall(). AFAICS,
> do_swap_account may not have been initialized by then. Also, if memcg
> as whole is disabled, it doesn't matter whether those files are
> registered or not, right? We probably need some comment there tho.
>
I think creating file based on really_do_swap_account is wrong.
(I'm sorry for this complication.)
How about creating this file unconditionally ? Returning -ENOTSUP in memcg's
handler will work well...anyway it's configured, no reason to show them is bad.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists