lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACKLOr03tTymT1vdTH7=nqEHu3OvAinPUHEusK+mR+J6Yc35mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:39:39 +0100
From:	javier Martin <javier.martin@...ta-silicon.com>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] dmaengine: imx-dma: merge dma arch code into dmaengine.

On 21 March 2012 16:39, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 16:20 +0100, Javier Martin wrote:
>> The following series have to be applied on top of the following patches:
>> [PATCH v2 1/2] dmaengine: Add support for MEMCPY for imx-dma.
>> [PATCH v3 2/2] dmaengine: Add support for multiple descriptors for imx-dma.
>>
>> As discussed with Vinod and Sascha, the file 'arch/arm/mach-imx/dma-v1.c'
>> is deprecated and no new patches are accepted for it.
>>
>> This series merges this code into the imx-dma.c dmaengine driver.
>>
>> Notes for v3:
>>  - I send the whole series again despite some patches being the same. I think
>>  this is more comfortable for Vinod than just sending those patches that have
>>  been modified.
>>  - I've generated my series with the following command this time:
>>  'git format-patch -s -13 -M -B --subject-prefix="PATCH v3"' as suggested by
>>  Sascha but still removing two files in 01/13 generates a lot of noisy diffs.
>>  Sorry about that.
>>  - I don't include Sascha's Tested-by since maybe he wants to test this last
>>  version.
> This doesn't apply for me (starting with 6th) on current slave-dma.next
> due to obvious changes which have gone into imx.
>
> Can you quickly rebase the series and resend.

Great,
now your 'next' branch is actually broken for imx-dma.

I'm currently trying a bisect to find out what is the commit
responsible for that but I suspect it will be related to the cookie
changes submitted by Russell.

-- 
Javier Martin
Vista Silicon S.L.
CDTUC - FASE C - Oficina S-345
Avda de los Castros s/n
39005- Santander. Cantabria. Spain
+34 942 25 32 60
www.vista-silicon.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ