lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1203221040030.15151@kaball-desktop>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:44:46 +0000
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
CC:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	"JBeulich@...ell.com" <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/xenbus: Add quirk to deal with misconfigured
 backends.

On Thu, 22 Mar 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> A rather annoying and common case is when booting a PVonHVM guest
> and exposing the PV KBD and PV VFB - as both of those do not
> make any sense. The HVM guest is using the VGA driver and the emulated
> keyboard for this. So we provide a very basic quirk framework
> (can be expanded in the future) to not wait for 6 minutes for those devices
> to initialize - they never wont.
> 
> To trigger this, put this in your guest config:
> 
> vfb = [ 'vnc=1, vnclisten=0.0.0.0 ,vncunused=1']
> 
> instead of this:
> vnc=1
> vnclisten="0.0.0.0"

While I do understand the issue you are trying to solve, it actually
makes sense to have PV KBD (and PV VFB maybe in the future) in a PVonHVM
guest. In particular PV KVB is already enabled in upstream QEMU for
PVonHVM guests because it allows users to have a keyboard and mouse
without USB emulation, that requires lots of wakes up in QEMU.

Maybe we could just reduce the timeout in general for all the PV
devices? After all, why are we waiting 6 minutes? I could understand 6
seconds, but 6 minutes seem really too much.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ