| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CALLzPKZQTAzKDNhN6hh1z7n6EFQLiLzfgjV4RdafoubSzNE3fg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:22:15 +0200
From: "Kasatkin, Dmitry" <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Safford <safford@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/12] ima: add ima_inode_setxattr/removexattr function
and calls
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Based on xattr_permission comments, the restriction to modify 'security'
> xattr is left up to the underlying fs or lsm. Ensure that not just anyone
> can modify or remove 'security.ima'.
>
> Changelog v1:
> - Unless IMA-APPRAISE is configured, use stub ima_inode_removexattr()/setxattr()
> functions. (Moved ima_inode_removexattr()/setxattr() to ima_appraise.c)
>
> Changelog:
> - take i_mutex to fix locking (Dmitry Kasatkin)
> - ima_reset_appraise_flags should only be called when modifying or
> removing the 'security.ima' xattr. Requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN privilege.
> (Incorporated fix from Roberto Sassu)
> - Even if allowed to update security.ima, reset the appraisal flags,
> forcing re-appraisal.
> - Replace CAP_MAC_ADMIN with CAP_SYS_ADMIN
> - static inline ima_inode_setxattr()/ima_inode_removexattr() stubs
> - ima_protect_xattr should be static
>
> Signed-off-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@...el.com>
> ---
> include/linux/ima.h | 17 ++++++++++
> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> security/security.c | 6 +++
> 3 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h
> index e2bfbb1..2c7223d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ima.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ima.h
> @@ -44,10 +44,27 @@ static inline int ima_file_mmap(struct file *file, unsigned long prot)
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE
> extern void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry);
> +extern int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
> + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len);
> +extern int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name);
> #else
> static inline void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> return;
> }
> +
> +static inline int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry,
> + const char *xattr_name,
> + const void *xattr_value,
> + size_t xattr_value_len)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry,
> + const char *xattr_name)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_IMA_APPRAISE_H */
> #endif /* _LINUX_IMA_H */
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> index 681cb6e..becc7e0 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c
> @@ -169,3 +169,60 @@ void ima_inode_post_setattr(struct dentry *dentry)
> rc = inode->i_op->removexattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA);
> return;
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * ima_protect_xattr - protect 'security.ima'
> + *
> + * Ensure that not just anyone can modify or remove 'security.ima'.
> + */
> +static int ima_protect_xattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
> + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
> +{
> + if (strcmp(xattr_name, XATTR_NAME_IMA) == 0) {
> + if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> + return -EPERM;
> + return 1;
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ima_reset_appraise_flags(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + struct integrity_iint_cache *iint;
> +
> + if (!ima_initialized || !ima_appraise || !S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> + return;
> +
> + iint = integrity_iint_find(inode);
> + if (!iint)
> + return;
> +
> + iint->flags &= ~(IMA_COLLECTED | IMA_APPRAISED | IMA_MEASURED);
> + return;
> +}
> +
> +int ima_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name,
> + const void *xattr_value, size_t xattr_value_len)
> +{
> + int result;
> +
> + result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, xattr_value,
> + xattr_value_len);
> + if (result == 1) {
> + ima_reset_appraise_flags(dentry->d_inode);
> + result = 0;
> + }
> + return result;
> +}
> +
> +int ima_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *xattr_name)
> +{
> + int result;
> +
> + result = ima_protect_xattr(dentry, xattr_name, NULL, 0);
> + if (result == 1) {
> + ima_reset_appraise_flags(dentry->d_inode);
> + result = 0;
> + }
> + return result;
> +}
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index e50bbf4..7bb127e 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -557,6 +557,9 @@ int security_inode_setxattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name,
> ret = security_ops->inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size, flags);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> + ret = ima_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> return evm_inode_setxattr(dentry, name, value, size);
> }
>
> @@ -592,6 +595,9 @@ int security_inode_removexattr(struct dentry *dentry, const char *name)
> ret = security_ops->inode_removexattr(dentry, name);
> if (ret)
> return ret;
> + ret = ima_inode_removexattr(dentry, name);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> return evm_inode_removexattr(dentry, name);
> }
>
> --
> 1.7.6.5
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists