[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120322144246.GA13873@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 15:42:46 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, keyrings@...ux-nfs.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"Bhamare, Sachin" <sbhamare@...asas.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 4/4] {RFC} kmod.c: Add new call_usermodehelper_timeout()
API
BTW,
On 03/22, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> In any case. I do not know why do we need timeout, but this is
> orthogonal to KILLABLE. Please redo your patches on top of -mm
> tree? Please note that in this case the change becomes trivial.
I have found 1-3 on marc.info, they look fine.
But 2/4 is not exactly correct, it forgets to do argv_free() if
call_usermodehelper_fns() returns -ENOMEM. And I guess you forgot
to remove the unused "struct subprocess_info *info".
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists