linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] checkpatch.pl: thou shalt not use () or (...) in function declarations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1332434013.1946.10.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date:	Thu, 22 Mar 2012 09:33:33 -0700
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:	Phil Carmody <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com>, apw@...onical.com,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] checkpatch.pl: thou shalt not use () or (...) in
 function declarations

On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 16:49 +0100, richard -rw- weinberger wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:27 PM, Phil Carmody
> <ext-phil.2.carmody@...ia.com> wrote:
> > After HPA's wonderful lkml post, referenced, it seems worth trying to
> > detect this robomatically.
> 
> See:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133193918813599

But Phil's test is better because it also
tests for function declarations on multiple
lines like

type
foo(...)

		if ($ctx =~ /((\b$Type\s+$Ident)\s*\(\s*(?:\.\.\.)?\s*\))/) {

The ERROR needs updating for a --ignore type though.
Something like this may be better.

		ERROR("FUNCTION_NO_PROTOTYPE",
		      "Bad function definition - $1 should probably be $2(void)\n" .
		      herecurr);

And I think the screed funny once but not useful.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/