[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201203221653.19268.vapier@gentoo.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 16:53:13 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc: Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>, nico@...xnic.net,
Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
"Hans-Christian Egtvedt" <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Guan Xuetao <gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Kbuild: centralize MKIMAGE and cmd_uimage definitions
On Thursday 22 March 2012 14:40:38 Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/16/2012 03:03 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > All ARCHs have the same definition of MKIMAGE. Move it to Makefile.lib
> > to avoid duplication.
> >
> > All ARCHs have similar definitions of cmd_uimage. Place a sufficiently
> > parameterized version in Makefile.lib to avoid duplication.
>
> Does this change look reasonable? It has acks from people working on 4
> of the 7 affected architectures; would you prefer acks from all?
isn't that what linux-next is for ? ;)
-mike
Download attachment "signature.asc " of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists